Apple vs Nokia vs Samsung vs Sony Ericsson , Best camera phones ?

Now almost every mobile phone, from dual-core powerhouses to cheap feature phone have a camera, so you can snap photographs and upload them to Facebook or email to friends within seconds. Many of the better camera phones can now match and even surpass basic digital cameras, as phone manufacturers use superior sensors and lenses.

Nokia was one of the manufacturers to produce phones with really good cameras. Early success include the N90 and the N93; a mobile phone with a unique flip-out screen that clearly influenced the Flip range of camcorders. Sony Ericsson had success too with the Satio a Symbian handset with excellent 12-megapixel camera and Xenon flash.
Here we’re pit five top camera phones against each other: the Apple iPhone 4, Nokia N8, Samsung Galaxy S2 and Sony Ericsson Xperia Arc. We've also thrown in a wild card in the form of the Samsung Omnia 7; a Windows Phone 7 handset with HD capability.
We’ll take a series of pictures and movies using each mobile phone to see which is our camera phone of choice.
The contenders: specifications
Apple iPhone 4
Significantly improved since the iPhone 3GS, the iPhone 4’s 5-megapixel camera phone with few tweakable features. Two to be precise. Flash and HDR mode, which combines a selection of pictures to bring out detail in shadow and highight areas. Luckily Apple is addressing this with the iOS 5 update, which adds lots of new features like crop, enhance and red-eye and also turns the volume control into a shutter.
Resolution: 5-megapixels
Video: 1280x720p 30fps
Flash: LED
Internal memory: 16Gb/32Gb
Lens aperture: Not quoted
Screen: 3.5-inches 960x640 pixel IPS/LCD Retina Display
Nokia N8
Unsurprisingly Nokia has equipped the N8 with an exhaustive selection of features, including adjustable: White Balance, Sharpness, Colour, Contrast, ISO and Face detection along with a smattering of scene modes. Pixel rating is the highest on test of 12-megapixels (although 5-megapixels are adequate for most people) and it’s the only handset here with a Xenon flash. Take photos using the dedicated shutter button, alternatively tap the screen. The screen is excellent is one of the best in bright sunlight.
Stills: 12-megapixel
Video: 1280x720p 30fps (via update)
Flash: Xenon
Internal memory: 16Gb, microSD
Lens aperture: Carl Zeiss f/2.8
Screen: 3.5-inchs OLED 640x360
Samsung Galaxy S2
Over the years Samsung has consistently produced solid cameraphones. Here it's flagship S2 phone has an impressive smattering of features including: White Balance, Metering, ISO, Face detection, Scene modes, EV, Anti Shake and Blink Detection. There's no top shutter, instead take pictures by tapping the screen. A useful extra is Outdoor Visibility, which makes the screen easier to see in bright sunlight.
Stills: 8-megapixel
Video: 1920x1080p 30fps
Flash: LED
Internal memory: 16Gb/microSD
Lens aperture: Not quoted
Screen: 4.3-inch Super AMOLED 800x480
Samsung Omnia 7
Like other Windows Phone 7 handsets the Omnia 7 had to follow Microsoft’s strict build requirements, which extended to photographic capability. This means the Omnia 7 has a solid camera shutter and 1280x720p HD movies. Features are impressive and include: contrast, medium, saturation, sharpness, EV, metering and Anti Shake along with Wide Dynamic Range.
Stills: 5-megapixel
Video: 1280x720p at 23fps
Flash: Power LED
Internal memory: 8GB
Lens aperture: Not quoted
Screen: 4-inch Super AMOLED 800x480
Sony Ericsson Xperia Arc
Sony Ericsson has added some really useful features to its latest crop of mobile phones, including a Sony Exmor R CMOS sensor. The Reality Display screen is excellent and is was easy to see in bright and dim conditions. Features are impressive, including: EV, White Balance, Metering, Image Stabiliser, Scene mode, Smile Detection. The Arc’s shutter feels a bit flimsy and its position on the far end can make it awkward to hold with one hand, alternatively you can tap the screen to take a picture.
Resolution stills: 8-megapixel
Video: 1280x720p at 29fps
Flash: LED
Internal memory: 320MB
Lens aperture: f/2.4
Screen: 4.2-inch Reality Display 854x480
Test 1: Artificial light
Flash off, all settings on auto, stabiliser on if featured

Apple iPhone 4 and Nokia N8
The Apple iPhone 4 produces the most unnatural photograph; here turning a pine bookshelf bright yellow examined closely fine detail isn't as sharp as the N8 or S2 either, although colours are very bright. The Nokia N8 produces a sharp, detailed picture with natural colours, is a little dark perhaps.

Samsung Galaxy S2 and Samsung Omnia 7
The S2 produces the sharpest photographs here, although our test picture had a pinkish tint and colours (the red of the playing card) lack punch. We found the Samsung Omnia 7 far more sensitive to camera shake than the others, resulting in softer shots when examined up closely. However colours and the exposure are fairly accurate.

Sony Ericsson Xperia Arc
Here colours are natural, if lacking a bit of punch (again the detail in the playing card) and examined closely detail isn't pin sharp, with more more visible noise.
Winner: Nokia N8
Test 2: Natural light
Flash off, all settings on auto, stabiliser on if featured. None of the pictures are full resolution; they had to be compressed for web.

Apple iPhone 4
The picture is very sharp - you can make out all the detail in the bricks on the white post - but pixels are more visible, especially in the sky and the area on the front left is a bit too red.

Nokia N8
A good effort, up close it isn't pin-sharp sharp, but colours are bold and accurate and it's good at handling shadow detail

Samsung Galaxy S2
Colours are generally accurate and up close detail is sharp. Colours perhaps lack the punch of rivals

Samsung Omnia 7
Detail in the trees is soft and not as sharp as any the others here (we can barely read the signs) and there’s more of a problem with image noise. Colours lack punch too.

Sony Ericsson Xperia Arc
Examined closely detail is very soft (you can barely make out the brick patten on the pillar), but conversely the text on the sign is very sharp - artificially so. Artefacts are especially visible on the pavement on the right. It handles contrast pretty well though.
Winner: Apple iPhone 4/Nokia N8
Test 3: Night shot
We’ll admit, most people aren’t going to be taking photographs in the dark using smartphones all the time. However, we wanted to see which phones was best.. All phones had the flash and stabiliser on (if applicable) and automatic settings were used.

Apple iPhone 4 and Nokia N8
Both of these produce pleasing results. The former is brighter and warmer with more fine detail up close, while the N8 with it's Xenon flash has less noise and you can see more of the subject

Samsung Omnia 7 and Samsung Galaxy S2
Producing a dark very noisy picture, the Samsung Omnia 7 (left) is easily the worst, the Galaxy S2 is marginally brighter, showing more of the subject.

Sony Ericsson Xperia Arc
Sony Ericsson’s Exmor R for mobile CMOS sensor helps produce a bright photo, where you can see almost the whole subject - even from 20 feet away. The picture is sharp with lots of detail, although coloured image noise is more visible when examined closely.
Winner: Sony Ericsson Xperia Arc
Test 4: Shooting movies
Please not all the footage has been compressed for YouTube

Apple iPhone 4
Unsurprisingly, 720p detail is not as sharp as the full res S2, however it's still one of the best here. Colour rendition is perhaps a bit warm, but footage is very smooth. All in all very impressive
Nokia N8
The frame rate here is 25fps (the update for 30fps is available now, so we will update the footage as soon as possible), which means action is not quite as smooth as we would like, however that’s pretty much our only complaint. Footage is sharp with lots of detail - far more the the Omnia 7 and Arc and elsewhere colours are natural. Audio is impressive too - you can even make out bird song along with cars.
Samsung Galaxy S2
The Samsung Galaxy S2 is the only phone here that shoots in 1920x1080 and in terms of the clarity of detail it’s apparent straight away. At the start of the movie you can see the detail in the leaves and the trees on the island and you can even read the word ‘Channel’ in the distance. However colour rendition isn't natural as the Nokia though, audio performance lacks clarity. In addition, twice we noticed the movie flick out of focus for a split second as we panned around.
Samsung Omnia 7
The Samsung Omnia 7’s HD video produces decent rather than amazing footage. Colours seem more muted where they should be bright. Contrast isn’t amazing, it’s overly dark in shadow areas, yet the white of the building is too bright. Fine details isn’t as sharp as the N8 or S2 and you can see more artefacts on the water/sky and slightly lower frame rate of 23fps means footage isn’t not as smooth. Audio is pretty good and not dominated by the cars - you can even hear bird song
Sony Ericsson Xperia Arc
We’re not impressed with the Sony Ericsson Arc's performance here. Overall the movie is far too soft, even though it’s HD. Colours seem a touch warm and less natural - the blue sky (in particular) isn’t accurate. However action is smooth thanks to a steady frame rate of 30fps. Audio is dominated by the sound of the louder vehicles on the road behind though.
Winner: Nokia N8
Best camera phones: verdict
Picking a winner for this test is tricky, no one handset excels at everything and even the less impressive phones will be fine for the odd snapshot.
The Samsung Omnia 7 offers a good range of features, but the shutter seems more sensitive than rivals, leading to more issues with camera shake. Stills just aren’t sharp enough and HD movies are soft with drab colours and more artefacts than rivals.
Sony Ericsson’s equipped the Xperia Arc with a good selection of features, a great screen and a sensor that produces best on test low-light performance. Overall we found stills aren't as sharp as we’d like and HD movie performance is the worst here, it’s very soft.
The Samsung Galaxy S2 is a solid performer, full HD footage is very sharp, although audio quality isn’t as clear as we’d like. Stills are good, but outclassed by other camera phones here.
We really like the iPhone’s camera. HD movie footage is sharp and smooth, although colour rendition isn’t as natural as the N8, stills are sharp and low light performance is solid. Our main issue is the lack of features, which the iOS 5 update will resolve.
So that leaves the Nokia N8. Stills are consistently sharp with natural colours, it’s even passable in low light. We’re really impressed with HD video performance, footage is sharp, with excellent audio and it handles changes to lighting conditions better than some others. The Nokia N8 might not have won every category, but consistently solid performance with stills and movies makes it our winner.
Overall Winner: Nokia N8
Source : http://recombu.com/news/best-camera-phones-apple-vs-nokia-vs-samsung-vs-sony-ericsson_M15276.html

Samsung TL500 review

Samsung TL500 is a digital camera with good features but desperate design. That is our newsroom first caught the eye. Many buyers of digital cameras over the decision by the appearance of the camera rather than on its karaketeristika. Yet Samsung has a big company and probably know what they are doing.


The TL500 supports RAW and gives enthusiasts full control over their images thanks to its shutter priority, aperture priority and full Manual shooting modes. When using these settings, shooters can experiment with features such as slower shutter speeds and depth of field; however, for those who prefer ease-of-use over manual controls, the TL500 also offers Samsung’s Smart Auto 2.0 (Still & Movie) scene recognition technology.



Applicable for video recording (640×480 / 30fps / H.264) and taking digital stills, this intelligent feature analyzes the scene and then automatically selects the appropriate settings for the best results possible. Using this mode requires minimal effort and does not sacrifice image quality for simple operation.



The high-end Schneider lens offers a 24mm, ultra-wide focal length and 3x optical zoom. Much wider than traditional compact cameras, the EX1’s 24mm ultra-wide angle lens allows photographers to capture more of a desired scene, such as beautiful landscapes and large groups of friends or family. For blur‑free images, the EX1’s lens is also paired with Samsung’s Dual Image Stabilisation technology.



Posted in Samsung Tags: aperture priority, beautiful landscapes, compact cameras, depth of field, digital cameras, digital stills, dual image, good features, image stabilisation, minimal effort, recognition technology, scene recognition, shutter priority, shutter speeds, smart auto, video recording, wide angle lens

Samsung ST93 Digital Camera review, specs and features

Samsung Electronics just has introduced their upcoming Digital Camera, namely Samsung ST93. The new Samsung Camera comes with ultra design which measures in 89.6 x 54.8 x 17.5mm, stylish ST range and high performance features such as Samsung‘s Magic Frame to create poster-quality visuals from a set of templates, including Wall Art, Full Moon, Retro Film, Ripple, Retro Record and Classic TV for people who looking for best digital camera
experience at an affordable price. The ST93 Digital Camera will be release to market in June 2011 with expected price at £129.99.

Samsung ST93 camera is boast 16-megapixel CCD sensor with support 5x optical zoom and 26mm wide angle lens, up to 3200 ISO sensitivity support, an LCD display, 5 Way UI Key, support 720p HD Movie recording at an impressive 30 frames per second, panorama shot function and Samsung Record Pause function for halt recording and start up again through the simple push of a button and Samsung Sound Alive feature provide clear sound recording by eliminating zoom noise.

Other features of the Samsung ST93 Digital Camera includes Dual Image Stabilisation, which combines both digital Image Stabilisation technology and optical image stabilisation technology by raising ISO sensitivity and/or performing deblurring to provides clearer images in any environment and prevents distorted photos.
Incoming search terms:
boost mobile samsung prevail,samsung galaxy prevail release date,camera samsung review,digital camera,samsung galaxy prevail,SAMSUNG galaxy tab 10 1 new version,Samsung ST93 Camera Battery .

Reviews Samsung ST80

The $249.99 (list) 14.2-megapixel Samsung ST80 creates a convincing box for Wi-Fi in a digital camera . Thanks to its built-in Wi-Fi, you can simply e-mail photos or upload them to your Facebook print albums
when you’re nearby a Wi-Fi hotspot. But the ST80 doesn’t offer visual picture stabilization—an ever-present underline in cameras in this cost range. This can meant becloud photos when sharpened high-speed or low-light images. But if you’re sharpened in great lighting, images from the ST80 are surprisingly sharp.

Design and Interface
One of the not as big condensed cameras you can buy, the ST80 is similar to the minuscule Canon PowerShot HS 300 ($249.99, 4 stars). Measuring 2.2 by 3.6 by 0.7 inches (HWD) and weighing usually 4.3 ounces, this camera fits simply in your pocket, but its all-plastic building creates it feels flimsy. Most of the camera’s functions are tranquil by the hold shade on the back, and you’ll have no complaint reckoning out what any earthy manage does; there are usually three: Power and Playback buttons, and a wizz trigger.

Most condensed digital cameras use a few form automatic picture stabilization—where possibly the lens or the picture sensor shifts to help lower blur. Not the ST80, and without it, you’ll have to use a faster shiver or aloft ISO surroundings to obtain great results when sharpened in low-light settings. The ST80 offers 3x visual wizz around a f/3-f/5.6, 35-105mm (35mm equivalent) lens. It’s not a quite wide-angled, long-reaching, or swift lens for any category of camera.

Despite a good-size 230K-dot 3-inch LCD, framing cinema feels really cramped. The LCD has a 16:9 aspect ratio, but the camera’s sensor has a 4:3 aspect ratio; if you’re sharpened at full resolution, the camera shrinks the on-screen picture to a pillar-boxed 2.5 inches. To compare, the low-cost General Electric E1480W ($169.99, 3 stars) offer a 3-inch LCD with a 4:3 aspect proportion so you can support and examination shots using the whole LCD.

The touch-based user interface on the ST80 feels poignant and intuitive, but is paltry since the average LCD, that is a resistive hold screen, not capacitive one similar to you’ll find on the Bloggie Touch slot camcorder ($199.99, 4 stars). The resistive manifestation doesn’t feel as accurate, and requires a small more pressure—turning the spark on and off, for example, isn’t difficult, but typing in e-mail addresses is frustrating. The Editors’ Choice Samsung TL225 ($349.99, 4 stars) offers the same UI, but it’s presented on a larger, higher-resolution (3.5-inch, 1.04-million-dot) LCD.

Other Features
One of the features that indeed sets this camera detached is its aptitude to e-mail and upload photos wirelessly. The camera has an residence book so you can come in and store contacts. The underline is elementary to use, but you can usually send one print at a time, and you can’t send files in their full resolution; instead they’re sent as 1.9-megapixel files (1600 by 1200 resolution).You can moreover upload images to Picasa, Facebook, PhotoBucket, and Samsung Imaging. The Facebook experience functions well with photos—you can login, emanate an manuscript and upload multi-part images to that album, and you can even crop all of your Facebook albums (not just the ones uploaded from the ST80).

The ST80 can moreover be used as a DLNA media server; when related to a Wi-Fi network, gadgets that can deed as DLNA customers (Sony’s PlayStation 3, and a few HDTVs and Blu-ray players)can perspective cinema and videos from ST80 wirelessly, or even download the files right away to local storage. The arriving Samsung SH100 will liner with an app and a Windows focus that will automatically collect all your new photos when your P.C. and camera are on the same network. If you do not wish to wait for and wish a easier wireless solution, ponder an Eye-Fi card, an SD card with built-in Wi-Fi that can automatically backup your cinema when on your home Wi-Fi network.

Performance

The ST80 isn’t quite fast. The camera can beginning up and fire in an average of 3.1 seconds, once on, it averages 3.8 seconds between shots. The comparably labelled Canon PowerShot HS300 shaves a second or more off any these times—it booted up and took a picture in an average of 2 seconds, with 2.2 seconds between shots.

In the Personal Computer Labs, you use Imatest to collect design data about picture quality. In our tests, the ST80′s photos were really sharp; the camera offering an glorious center-weighted average of 2,053 lines per picture height. That even outperformed the much-pricier Editors’ Choice Canon PowerShot S95 ($399.99, 4 stars), that prisoner a center-weighted average of 1,858 lines per picture height. Like the Canon S95, the ST80 may be pushed all the way up to ISO 1600 to collect more light without producing as well sufficient noise. Imatest deliberate reduction than 1.5 percent sound up to ISO 1600, that is a great result.Video available by the ST80 can attain up to 720p fortitude (1280-by-720 at 30 frames per second.) It sounds good, but there are caveats. You can use the visual zoom, but the audio is cut out whilst zooming to prevent capturing deafening sound from the lens motor. The camera moreover doesn’t refocus whilst recording video, expected because you’ll moreover takeover sound from the lens. While the ST80 can record high-definition videos, they can’t be wirelessly uploaded in HD or even 640-by-480 typical definition. The ST80 uploads usually 320-by-240 QVGA-quality videos and usually to YouTube, not Facebook.

The ST80 has a singular port. Using the enclosed exclusive line you can block the camera in to the enclosed wall horse or a USB dock on a P.C. to give your images. Many other condensed cameras offer noteworthy mini-USB and mini-HDMI ports. Also different many cameras, the ST80 writes to microSD cards, not standard-size SD, so your SDHC card reader won’t help you prevent joining the camera around a line unless you have a microSD adapter.

If you really need a way to send or upload photos to Facebook right from your camera, the Samsung ST80 might be a great fit for you. But the insufficient of picture stabilization is a big disastrous in a $250 camera. If you wish to increase Wi-Fi features to your stream camera, examine an Eye-Fi card. If you wish something a small more arguable with visual picture stabilization is to same price, give the Canon PowerShot HS 300 a try. The ST80 produces pointy images in splendid light and has a few innovative features, but it comes with a few flaws that are difficult to ignore.